alt.politics.economics

wrote in message
news:atojr3pik9q9oq78q40rvh8q4vfa4fgvl0@...
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:42:39 GMT, "Econotron"
> wrote:
>
>> wrote in message
>>news:vdpgr35h2vdctormvgb3gv9u5m1ujdj5q8@...
>>> On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 23:56:05 -0800 (PST), amatbus2002
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Thus, to say that Clinton would be a more polarizing figure than Obama
>>>>is simply delusional.
>>>
>>>
>>> LOL. You confuse offering a clear choice with "polarizing". 70% of
>>> America wants us out of Iraq. And you want to run towards that 30%?
>>>
>>And 85% of those 70% do not really know what they want.
>
> LOL. Because they disagree with you? LOL.
> Or because they learned some of the truth behind th lies and got to
> see how incompetently the whole thing was handled?
>
No, because I would never use something like a number of people that agree
with me as a proof of being right. Most people are easily swayed. Most
supported Hitler in Germany and Stalin in Russia, and they were regular
folks, just like you and me.
>
>>Just looking at the
>>wild swings in the recent election poll numbers over the short period of
>>time should confirm that. How do I know it is 85%? Life experience :-)
>>(actually, it is between 85 and 90).
>>e.
>
> Because you know all. LOL
>
I sure know the above :-)
e.