Group: alt.politics.economics
From: Hugo S. Cunningham
Date: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 6:31 PM
Subject: Re: NYT Screws Pooch Again

On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 08:56:31 -0500, eldorado wrote:

>On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, Hugo S. Cunningham wrote:

[...]

> > But I notice you did not try to dispute my statement about the
>NYT's > "mea culpa" on Judith Martin, in contrast to their silence on Duke
>> Lacrosse.
>>
>
>The discussion is on Judith Miller and the large amount of right wing
>writings she published for the NYT. It is not on the Lacross team.

The discussion involving me is on whether the NYT is "liberal." Those
who deny it still owe me the courtesy of defining "liberal," with
clear examples of current politicians and/or journalists.

> The
>articles on the Lacross team did not speak one way or the other on the
>NYT's political leanings. Having Judith Miller write articles rah-rahing
>the war on the front page did.

Judith Miller and Michael Nifong's claque offer two different
perspectives on the same original question -- is the NYT "liberal"?

(I may address the rest of your post later, though we seem to be
arguing in circles.)

--Hugo S. Cunningham