alt.politics.economics

wrote in message
news:i4qbq3hq4po77klo82tibdlb36fok02602@...
> On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 21:38:20 -0800, "Clave"
> wrote:
>
>>"tankfixer" <@> wrote in message
>>news:@...
>>> In article ,
>>> ClaviusNoSpamDammit@ says...
>>>> "tankfixer" <@> wrote in message
>>>> news:@...
>>>> > In article ,
>>>> > ClaviusNoSpamDammit@ says...
>>
>><...>
>>
>>>> >> So yeah. Phony. Fraudulent, if you prefer. You either
>>>> >> deliberately
>>>> >> fucked with the numbers yourself, or you blindly cut & pasted from
>>>> >> someone else who did.
>>>> >
>>>> > The fellow who did post them originally is a trusted srouce.
>>>>
>>>> *Is*? You mean he's *still* a "trusted source?"
>>>
>>> Yes, you and your friends nattering to the contrary the numbers from the
>>> report back him up.
>>
>>No, they fucking *don't*. Your "trusted source" is either a liar or as
>>big a fool as you are.
>>
>>Not that those are mutually exclusive, mind.
>
> His "trusted source" was a brand new Nym with 8 posts starting on that
> day.

I found it in one of those "forward this to all your friends" emails with
the exact same inaccuracies.

Either way he's a huge idiot.

Jim