alt.politics.economics

On Aug 24, 10:59 am, "no surrender" wrote:
> wrote in message
>
> news: @ ...> Topaz, you make a couple of good points.
>
> > I too have problems calling homosexuals "gay". The unfortunate side
> > effect is that talking about the "gay '90s" (that 1890s) and listening
> > to the Flinstones theme song takes on a different meaning. I want the
> > word "gay" back.
>
> > The other good point is that the right claims to be for personal
> > freedom but is actually for government control over personal freedom.
>
> *****
> Merely your opinion masquerading as fact.

Topaz wrote:
It [the right] puts the
good of the nation first and ahead of the freedom of individuals
to
corrupt the culture of the nation.

Leftists believe in the Rede of Witchcraft which states-- If it
harm none, do what will you will.

So Topaz believes in government control of personal freedoms that
harm none. He claims this is for the good of the nation. If these
personal freesoms were to actually harm anyone then there would be
no opposition between left and right by his own words.

I am a strong supporter of many aspects of our culture. That is why
I support government control of personal freedoms that harm others.
For instance, I don't think we should allow people to practice
cultural
norms from other countries (or any religion) that treat women as
chattle.