alt.politics.economics

forbisgaryg@ wrote in news:6dab2950-7984-48df-bd7c-bae288712531
@:

> Jim Alder wrote:
>> forbisga...@ wrote:
>> > What you've cited so far is related by ideology rather than
>> > professionalism in the field.
>>
>> No. If you're going to go back to my original stance, you'll see that I was
>> doing the same, and it is those who insist that we are the cause of global
>> warming that have an agenda.
>
> I've talked quite a bit about bias.
> The sources I cite are professors in the field. You've
> citing one individual who has a professorship but is tied to a right
> wing think tank...

Why do you say he's "tied to" one, merely because they print his study?
Who do you expect to print a study that flies in the face of what has become a
dogma of the Left?

> ...and another who is an amateur who has has several
> books publish with right wing positions.

Several books published doesn't sound like an amateur to me.

> Science in politically neutral. If this was an open issue you'd see
> lots of talk by scientists in the field who don't take political
> positions.

I do. But then, I don't think the issue of climate change is politically
neutral.

> What is your reason for claiming that the scientist who
> have concluded human activity has caused global warming (not the same
> as saying "we are the cause of global warming") have an agenda?

I explained that already, too.

--
"Life isn't about waiting for the storm
to pass... it's about learning to dance
in the rain."