alt.politics.economics

wrote in message news: @news. ...
> On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 20:48:02 -0500, nat wrote:
>
>>royls@ wrote:
>>> On Tue, 9 Oct 2007 10:26:59 -0400, "Paul Thomas, CPA"
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> wrote
>>>>
>>>>> Do you deny that people were at liberty to use all land since
>>>>>time immemorial before someone concocted the notion of owning it?
>>>>
>>>>Yup.
>>>
>>> Of course, because you have to keep your record of always being wrong
>>> intact.
>>>
>>>>People could use whatever they needed to
>>>
>>> Lie. They were at liberty to use more than they needed to.
>>> Everything you say is a lie, because you are a habitual, pathological
>>> liar.
>>>
>>>>as long as it didn't impede
>>>>the perceived use by another person or group of persons.
>>>
>>> Wrong. Sometimes impeding others' use was accepted, in other cases
>>> not. The point is, they found ways to share access while preserving
>>> everyone's right to use the land, dispoving the brain-dead claim that
>>> it is "physically impossible."
>>>
>>>>And if, back then,
>>>>some 12,000 years ago and longer, people fought over, and defended and
>>>>protected, their land and their rights to the land and it's resources.
>>>
>>> Nope. There was no concept of private ownership of land. All
>>> conflicts over land were communal until the advent of agriculture and
>>> the rise of the state.
>>
>>Ah, what we have here is a wannabe anarchist.
>
> No, just an actual informed person.

Ah yes, a legend in his own alleged mind.