alt.politics.economics

"Mark M." wrote
>>>Where? Post what he said so we can have a look.
>
> So why did you cut out what I wrote if you want to compare them?


That IS what you wrote. You wrote: "Where? Post what he said so we can
have a look."



And I posted what I wrote.


>> "Paul Thomas, CPA" wrote on
>> Saturday, October 06, 2007 @ 11:57 AM
>>
>>>Which is far from allowing anyone and everyone to use the land, as that
>>>individual sees fit, with impunity. And you know that, or should.
>>>
>>>Government owned resources are very common. Even allowing "free" access
>>>to certain resources is common. But even in those cases, there are no
>>>rights for individuals to use those resources as they see fit, without
>>>running afoul of the government who controls at that point, your use and
>>>enjoyment.
>>>
>>>Take a National Park as an example. You are free (subject to some access
>>>fee) to enjoy it or not, but you aren't free to hunt, fish, cut timber,
>>>mine the resources, build a home, etc and so on. Again, you may be
>>>permitted, subject to additional fees, to do so, but if you didn't get
>>>that permission to do so, and you did, it's not without impunity.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> You and roy must be cousins.



If you need to compare it to something else that you wrote, then buy a
printer or get a wider screen.



--
Have no fear of perfection - you'll never reach it.
----------
Paul A. Thomas, CPA
Athens, Georgia