Group: alt.politics.economics
From: MACK DADDY
Date: Sunday, February 24, 2008 9:47 PM
Subject: Re: Are Libs Nuts?

On Feb 24, 2:31=A0pm, "Jeff Strickland" wrote:
> "no surrender" wrote in message
>
> news:a-adncN8McYNdlzanZ2dnUVZ_umlnZ2d@...
>
>
>
> >> >*****
> >> >I have already dubbed them lo-lects (low intellect libs.) It's
> > interesting
> >> >to learn I have been in the avant-garde. Dennis
>
> >> No Surrender - Dennis the menace, You are reaching way out there!
> > *****
> > Yep, that's what we avant-garde types do, lead the the parade showing
> > lo-lects (low intellect libs) =A0the correct path.
>
> > Dennis
>
> Here we are, trying to re-educate them and draw them over from the Dark
> Side, and just when we get the hook set you come and call them names.
>
> I'm all for dragging them to the correct path, and leading the parade give=
s
> them somebody to follow, but surely you realize the resist coming to the
> light when you refer to them as lo-lects, just as you resist the term
> right-tard.
>
> Perhaps you should try to be more subtle. Maybe you could dub them somethi=
ng
> that means, "dumber than a rock," but sounds smart. Democrat.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
But you would be totally wrong because Democrats, by nature, are far
smarter than Republitards.